Unable to compare with previous version: Unable to find version history at https://gematik.de/fhir/isik (Problem #1 with package-list.json at https://gematik.de/fhir/isik: Not Found)
IPA Comparison:
n/a
IPS Comparison:
n/a
Validation Flags:
On: autoLoad; Off: hintAboutNonMustSupport, anyExtensionsAllowed, checkAggregation, showReferenceMessages, noExperimentalContent, displayWarnings
This IG is version 4.0.1, while the IG 'hl7.fhir.uv.subscriptions-backport.r4' is from version 4.0.0
ImplementationGuide.dependency[5].url
warning
The canonical URL for an Implementation Guide must point directly to the implementation guide resource, not to the Implementation Guide as a whole
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource ValueSet/ISiKValueSetExample. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource CodeSystem/CodeSystemExample. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource HealthcareService/ISiKMedizinischeBehandlungseinheitExample. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/DorisQuelle. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/DorisZiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/Fachabteilungskontakt. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktBettenverlegung. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktEntlassung. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktFachbereichswechsel1. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktFachbereichswechsel2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktMinimal2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktNormal. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktStationaereAufnahme. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktStationswechsel1. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktStationswechsel2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Schedule/ISiKKalenderExample. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Appointment/ISiKTerminExample. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Appointment/ISiKTerminExampleExtendedICU. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Slot/ISiKTerminblockExample. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/IsikPatientTemplate. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Subscription/PatientMergeSubscriptionExample. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/PatientinMinimal. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/PatientinMusterfrau. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/PatientinNormal. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/SZ1Nachstationaer. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/SZ1Patient. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/SZ1Stationaer. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/SZ1Vorstationaer. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/SZ2Encounter. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/SZ2Patient. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/isik-encounter-Sternenfall. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/isik-patient-156722. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
output/Akteure.html
information
The html source does not contain the publish box; this is recommended for publishing support (see note at https://confluence.hl7.org/spaces/FHIR/pages/66930646/FHIR+Implementation+Guide+Publishing+Requirements#FHIRImplementationGuidePublishingRequirements-PublishBox). Note that this is mandatory for HL7 specifications, and on the ci-build, but in other cases it's still recommended (this is only reported once, but applies for all pages)
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation' for "CapabilityStatement-Imports-Expectation-Extension" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation' for "CapabilityStatement-Imports-Expectation-Extension" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPersonImGesundheitsberuf' for "ISiKPersonImGesundheitsberuf" cannot be resolvedHTML_LINK_CHECK_FAILED
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPersonImGesundheitsberuf' for "ISiKPersonImGesundheitsberuf" cannot be resolvedHTML_LINK_CHECK_FAILED
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPersonImGesundheitsberuf' for "ISiKPersonImGesundheitsberuf" cannot be resolvedHTML_LINK_CHECK_FAILED
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPersonImGesundheitsberuf' for "ISiKPersonImGesundheitsberuf" cannot be resolvedHTML_LINK_CHECK_FAILED
No conformance term found in the text: 301 Abs. 3 SGB V. Dieser gehört zu den ‘Medizinischen Daten des Behandlungsfalls’ entsprechend der Definitionen für die Datenübermittlung
nach CONFORMANCE_STATEMENT_NOCONFWORD
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISIKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISIKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISIKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISIKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation' for "CapabilityStatement-Imports-Expectation-Extension" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation' for "CapabilityStatement-Imports-Expectation-Extension" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'Erlaeuterung-Akteurs-und-Rollenmodell.md' for "(Akteure und Rollen)" cannot be resolvedHTML_LINK_CHECK_FAILED
index.html
information
No conformance term found in the text: 19 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 2 KHSFV bzw. CONFORMANCE_STATEMENT_NOCONFWORD
1
warning
The HTML fragment 'ip-statements.xhtml' is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
2
warning
An HTML fragment from the set [cross-version-analysis.xhtml, cross-version-analysis-inline.xhtml] is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
3
warning
An HTML fragment from the set [dependency-table.xhtml, dependency-table-short.xhtml, dependency-table-nontech.xhtml] is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
4
warning
The HTML fragment 'globals-table.xhtml' is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'http://fhir.org/packages/de.basisprofil.r4/ImplementationGuide/de.basisprofil.r4'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'http://fhir.org/packages/dvmd.kdl.r4/ImplementationGuide/dvmd.kdl.r4'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
value should not start or finish with whitespace '\nDieses Profil ermöglicht die Abbildung von Besuchen/Aufenthalten eines Patienten in einer Gesundheitseinrichtung.\n\n**Motivation**\n\nInformationen über die Besuche des Patienten entlang seines \nBehandlungspfades im Krankenhaus sind ein wichtiger Bestandteil \ndes einrichtungsinternen Datenaustausches. \nSie ermöglichen die Unterscheidung von stationären und ambulanten \nsowie aufgenommenen und entlassenen Patienten. \nWeiterhin ist aus den Besuchsinformationen der aktuelle Aufenthaltsort \ndes Patienten (Fachabteilung, Station, Bettplatz) ermittelbar. \nKlinische Ressourcen werden in FHIR durch Verlinkung auf die \nEncounter-Ressource in einen Kontext zum Besuch gestellt. \nDieser Kontext ist wichtig für die Steuerung von Zugriffsberechtigungen \nund Abrechnungsprozessen. \n\nZu Beginn der meisten klinischen Workflows steht die Auswahl \ndes Besuchskontextes. \nDies geschieht bspw. durch das Suchen der Encounter-Ressource \nanhand von Eigenschaften wie Aufnahmenummer, Fallart oder Aufnahmedatum. \nDaraufhin werden die zutreffenden Suchergebnisse angezeigt \nund der gewünschte Besuch ausgewählt.\n\nIn FHIR werden Besuche, Aufenthalte, aber auch virtuelle Kontakte mit der `Encounter`-Ressource repräsentiert.\n\nWeitere Hinweise zu den Abgrenzungen der Begrifflichkeiten Fall und Kontakt finden sie unter [Fall-Begriff in ISiK](https://gemspec.gematik.de/ig/fhir/isik/basis/6.0.0-rc/Abbildung-des-Konstrukts-Fall.html).\n\n**Kompatibilität**\n\nFür das Profil ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung wird eine Kompatibilität \nmit folgenden Profilen angestrebt; \nallerdings kann nicht sichergestellt werden, dass Instanzen, \ndie gegen ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung valide sind, \nauch valide sind gegen:\n\n* Profil [Kontakt mit einer Gesundheitseinrichtung \nder Medizininformatik-Initiative](https://www.medizininformatik-initiative.de/fhir/core/modul-fall/StructureDefinition/KontaktGesundheitseinrichtung)\n\nHinweise zu Inkompatibilitäten können über die [Portalseite](https://service.gematik.de/servicedesk/customer/portal/16) gemeldet werden.'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_String_WS
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.uv.ips#1.1.0 released on 2022-11-22, but the most recent appropriate version is 2.0.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be consideredIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING_OLD
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[3] (l1/c2255)
warning
The ImplementationGuide is based on FHIR version 4.0.1 but package hl7.fhir.uv.subscriptions-backport.r4#1.1.0 is based on FHIR version 4.0.0. In general, this version mismatch should be avoided - some tools will try to make this work with variable degrees of success, but others will not even tryIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[4] (l1/c2421)
warning
The canonical URL http://fhir.org/packages/de.basisprofil.r4/ImplementationGuide/de.basisprofil.r4 doesn't point to an actual ImplementationGuide resourceIG_DEPENDENCY_INVALID_URL
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[5] (l1/c2557)
error
The URL should refer directly to the ImplementationGuide resource (e.g. include '/ImplementationGuide/')IG_DEPENDENCY_DIRECT
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[5] (l1/c2557)
warning
The canonical URL http://fhir.de/packages/de.ihe-d.terminology doesn't point to an actual ImplementationGuide resourceIG_DEPENDENCY_INVALID_URL
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[6] (l1/c2702)
warning
The canonical URL http://fhir.org/packages/dvmd.kdl.r4/ImplementationGuide/dvmd.kdl.r4 doesn't point to an actual ImplementationGuide resourceIG_DEPENDENCY_INVALID_URL
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[7] (l1/c2881)
warning
The ImplementationGuide uses package ihe.formatcode.fhir#1.4.0 released on 2025-05-20, but the most recent appropriate version is 1.5.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be consideredIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING_OLD
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[8] (l1/c3025)
warning
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.uv.sdc#3.0.0 released on 2022-03-08, but the most recent appropriate version is 4.0.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be consideredIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING_OLD
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKTermin|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKTermin|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Appointment.participant[0]: discriminator = true and (actor.resolve() is Patient)
,
Appointment.participant[0]: discriminator = true and (actor.resolve() is Practitioner)
,
Appointment.participant[0]: discriminator = true and (actor.resolve() is HealthcareService)
,
Appointment.participant[0]: discriminator = true and (actor.resolve() is RelatedPerson)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKTermin|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKTermin|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Appointment.participant[0]: discriminator = true and (actor.resolve() is Patient)
,
Appointment.participant[0]: discriminator = true and (actor.resolve() is Practitioner)
,
Appointment.participant[0]: discriminator = true and (actor.resolve() is HealthcareService)
,
Appointment.participant[0]: discriminator = true and (actor.resolve() is RelatedPerson)
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/SubscriptionTopic/appointment-update'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/SubscriptionTopic/appointment-cancel'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Terminplanung'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/SubscriptionTopic/appointment-update'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/SubscriptionTopic/appointment-cancel'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/CodeSystem-CodeSystemExample.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/CodeSystemExample) does not match the URL (http://example.org/fhir/CodeSystem/TestKatalog). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
CodeSystem (l1/c1501)
warning
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
--
CodeSystem (l1/c1501)
warning
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.description is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
--
Resource
warning
The resource CodeSystem/CodeSystemExample should have an OID assigned to cater for possible use with OID based terminology systems e.g. CDA usage (OIDs are easy to assign - see https://build.fhir.org/ig/FHIR/fhir-tools-ig/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html#ig-parameters-auto-oid-root)
--
input/resources/CodeSystem-CodeSystemExample
error
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/CodeSystemExample vs http://example.org/fhir/CodeSystem/TestKatalog
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
CodeSystems SHOULD have a stated value for the caseSensitive element so that users know the status and meaning of the code system clearlyCODESYSTEM_CS_NONHL7_MISSING_ELEMENT
--
CodeSystem (l1/c24209)
warning
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.caseSensitive is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/CodeSystem-MimeTypeCS.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/MimeTypeCS) does not match the URL (urn:ietf:bcp:13). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
input/resources/CodeSystem-MimeTypeCS
error
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/MimeTypeCS vs urn:ietf:bcp:13
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/CodeSystem-subscription-notification-type.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/subscription-notification-type) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/subscription-notification-type). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
CodeSystem (l1/c3860)
warning
The nominated WG 'fhir' means that the publisher should be 'HL7 International / FHIR Infrastructure' but 'gematik GmbH' was foundVALIDATION_HL7_PUBLISHER_MISMATCH
Most code systems defined in HL7 IGs will need to move to THO later during the process. Consider giving this code system a THO URL now (See https://confluence.hl7.org/display/TSMG/Terminology+Play+Book, and/or talk to TSMG)CODESYSTEM_THO_CHECK
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[3]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[3]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[3]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[0]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[0]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[0]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
Wrong Display Name 'Inpatient' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP. Valid display is 'inpatient encounter' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP: 'Inpatient'' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc'; Wrong Display Name 'Inpatient' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP. Valid display is 'inpatient encounter' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US'))Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/OperationDefinition-ISiKAppointmentBookOperation.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/OperationDefinition/ISiKAppointmentBookOperation) does not match the URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/OperationDefinition/AppointmentBook). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/OperationDefinition/ISiKAppointmentBookOperation vs https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/OperationDefinition/AppointmentBook
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
Constraint failed: kvid-1: 'Der unveränderliche Teil der KVID muss 10-stellig sein und mit einem Großbuchstaben anfangen (matches('^[A-Z][0-9]{9}$'))' (defined in http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/identifier-kvid-10)http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/identifier-kvid-10#kvid-1
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-namenszusatz' in url)
,
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' in url)
,
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-namenszusatz' in url)
,
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' in url)
,
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.gender.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/gender-amtlich-de' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.birthDate.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' in url)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.address[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.address[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' in url)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' in url)
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/StructureDefinition-AppointmentReplaces.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/AppointmentReplaces) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Appointment.replaces). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
StructureDefinition (l1/c17358)
error
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extensionVALIDATION_HL7_WG_NEEDED
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/AppointmentReplaces vs http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Appointment.replaces
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '2.0.0', found versions: 0.3.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 1.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0), 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation|2.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '2.0.0', found versions: 0.3.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 1.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0), 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation|2.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
--
StructureDefinition.snapshot (l1/c122415)
warning
The slice 'ErweiterterFachabteilungsschluessel' on path 'Schedule.specialty.coding' is not marked as 'must-support' which is not consistent with the element that defines the slicing, where 'must-support' is true
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
ISiK-enc-8: The left side is inherently a collection, and so the expression 'coding.code != 'billing'' may fail or return false if there is more than one item in the content being evaluatedFHIRPATH_COLLECTION_STATUS_OPERATION_LEFT
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
--
StructureDefinition.snapshot (l1/c112438)
warning
The slice 'ErweiterterFachabteilungsschluessel' on path 'HealthcareService.specialty.coding' is not marked as 'must-support' which is not consistent with the element that defines the slicing, where 'must-support' is true
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/regex|5.2.0 is deprecated with the note: 'This was deprecated in favor of using a constraint on the element using FHIRPath, since constraints allow for the provision of a human readable message associated with the regex'MSG_DEPENDS_ON_DEPRECATED_NOTE
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The repeating element has a pattern. The pattern will apply to all the repeats (this has not been clear to all users)SD_VALUE_TYPE_REPEAT_HINT
--
StructureDefinition.snapshot (l1/c461932)
warning
The slice 'Versichertennummer_PKV' on path 'Patient.identifier' is not marked as 'must-support' which is not consistent with the element that defines the slicing, where 'must-support' is true
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0276'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0276' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0276|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
--
StructureDefinition.snapshot (l1/c290151)
warning
The slice 'ErweiterterFachabteilungsschluessel' on path 'Appointment.specialty.coding' is not marked as 'must-support' which is not consistent with the element that defines the slicing, where 'must-support' is true
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0276'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0276' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0276|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/StructureDefinition-PlannedEndDate.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedEndDate) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedEndDate). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
StructureDefinition (l1/c16986)
error
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extensionVALIDATION_HL7_WG_NEEDED
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedEndDate vs http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedEndDate
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/StructureDefinition-PlannedStartDate.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedStartDate) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedStartDate). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
StructureDefinition (l1/c17068)
error
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extensionVALIDATION_HL7_WG_NEEDED
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedStartDate vs http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedStartDate
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/StructureDefinition-ScheduleName.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ScheduleName) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Schedule.name). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
StructureDefinition (l1/c16988)
error
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extensionVALIDATION_HL7_WG_NEEDED
Pinned the version of http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode to 10.0.0 from choices of 10.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0), 7.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 9.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0)PIN_VERSION
Pinned the version of http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/appointment-cancellation-reason to 2.1.1 from choices of 0.1.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 2.1.1 (hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0)PIN_VERSION
--
ValueSet (l1/c2424)
warning
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/ValueSet-ISiKValueSetExample.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKValueSetExample) does not match the URL (http://example.org/fhir/ValueSet/TestValueSet). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
ValueSet (l1/c1798)
warning
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.title is mandatory, but it is not present
--
ValueSet (l1/c1798)
warning
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.experimental is mandatory, but it is not present
--
ValueSet (l1/c1798)
warning
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.description is mandatory, but it is not present
--
Resource
warning
The resource ValueSet/ISiKValueSetExample should have an OID assigned to cater for possible use with OID based terminology systems e.g. CDA usage (OIDs are easy to assign - see https://build.fhir.org/ig/FHIR/fhir-tools-ig/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html#ig-parameters-auto-oid-root)
--
input/resources/ValueSet-ISiKValueSetExample
error
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKValueSetExample vs http://example.org/fhir/ValueSet/TestValueSet
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/ValueSet-subscription-notification-type.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/subscription-notification-type) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/subscription-notification-type). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
ValueSet (l1/c2112)
warning
The nominated WG 'fhir' means that the publisher should be 'HL7 International / FHIR Infrastructure' but 'gematik GmbH' was foundVALIDATION_HL7_PUBLISHER_MISMATCH
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.description is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.caseSensitive is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Most code systems defined in HL7 IGs will need to move to THO later during the process. Consider giving this code system a THO URL now (See https://confluence.hl7.org/display/TSMG/Terminology+Play+Book, and/or talk to TSMG)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKTermin|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKTermin|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Wrong Display Name 'Inpatient' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP. Valid display is 'inpatient encounter' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
ISiK-enc-8: The left side is inherently a collection, and so the expression 'coding.code != 'billing'' may fail or return false if there is more than one item in the content being evaluated
The canonical URL http://fhir.org/packages/de.basisprofil.r4/ImplementationGuide/de.basisprofil.r4 doesn't point to an actual ImplementationGuide resource
The ImplementationGuide is based on FHIR version 4.0.1 but package hl7.fhir.uv.subscriptions-backport.r4#1.1.0 is based on FHIR version 4.0.0. In general, this version mismatch should be avoided - some tools will try to make this work with variable degrees of success, but others will not even try
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.uv.ips#1.1.0 released on 2022-11-22, but the most recent appropriate version is 2.0.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be considered
The ImplementationGuide uses package ihe.formatcode.fhir#1.4.0 released on 2025-05-20, but the most recent appropriate version is 1.5.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be considered
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.uv.sdc#3.0.0 released on 2022-03-08, but the most recent appropriate version is 4.0.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be considered
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/regex|5.2.0 is deprecated with the note: 'This was deprecated in favor of using a constraint on the element using FHIRPath, since constraints allow for the provision of a human readable message associated with the regex'
Pinned the version of http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode to 10.0.0 from choices of 10.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0), 7.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 9.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0)
Pinned the version of http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/appointment-cancellation-reason to 2.1.1 from choices of 0.1.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 2.1.1 (hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0)
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/CodeSystem-CodeSystemExample.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/CodeSystemExample) does not match the URL (http://example.org/fhir/CodeSystem/TestKatalog). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/CodeSystem-MimeTypeCS.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/MimeTypeCS) does not match the URL (urn:ietf:bcp:13). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/CodeSystem-subscription-notification-type.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/subscription-notification-type) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/subscription-notification-type). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/OperationDefinition-ISiKAppointmentBookOperation.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/OperationDefinition/ISiKAppointmentBookOperation) does not match the URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/OperationDefinition/AppointmentBook). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/StructureDefinition-AppointmentReplaces.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/AppointmentReplaces) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Appointment.replaces). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/StructureDefinition-PlannedEndDate.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedEndDate) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedEndDate). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/StructureDefinition-PlannedStartDate.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedStartDate) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedStartDate). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/StructureDefinition-ScheduleName.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ScheduleName) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Schedule.name). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/ValueSet-ISiKValueSetExample.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKValueSetExample) does not match the URL (http://example.org/fhir/ValueSet/TestValueSet). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Terminplanung/input/resources/ValueSet-subscription-notification-type.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/subscription-notification-type) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/subscription-notification-type). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '2.0.0', found versions: 0.3.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 1.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0), 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation|2.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '2.0.0', found versions: 0.3.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 1.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0), 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation|2.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0276'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0276' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0276|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0276'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0276' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0276|3.0.0'
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP: 'Inpatient'' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc'; Wrong Display Name 'Inpatient' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP. Valid display is 'inpatient encounter' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US'))
value should not start or finish with whitespace '\nDieses Profil ermöglicht die Abbildung von Besuchen/Aufenthalten eines Patienten in einer Gesundheitseinrichtung.\n\n**Motivation**\n\nInformationen über die Besuche des Patienten entlang seines \nBehandlungspfades im Krankenhaus sind ein wichtiger Bestandteil \ndes einrichtungsinternen Datenaustausches. \nSie ermöglichen die Unterscheidung von stationären und ambulanten \nsowie aufgenommenen und entlassenen Patienten. \nWeiterhin ist aus den Besuchsinformationen der aktuelle Aufenthaltsort \ndes Patienten (Fachabteilung, Station, Bettplatz) ermittelbar. \nKlinische Ressourcen werden in FHIR durch Verlinkung auf die \nEncounter-Ressource in einen Kontext zum Besuch gestellt. \nDieser Kontext ist wichtig für die Steuerung von Zugriffsberechtigungen \nund Abrechnungsprozessen. \n\nZu Beginn der meisten klinischen Workflows steht die Auswahl \ndes Besuchskontextes. \nDies geschieht bspw. durch das Suchen der Encounter-Ressource \nanhand von Eigenschaften wie Aufnahmenummer, Fallart oder Aufnahmedatum. \nDaraufhin werden die zutreffenden Suchergebnisse angezeigt \nund der gewünschte Besuch ausgewählt.\n\nIn FHIR werden Besuche, Aufenthalte, aber auch virtuelle Kontakte mit der `Encounter`-Ressource repräsentiert.\n\nWeitere Hinweise zu den Abgrenzungen der Begrifflichkeiten Fall und Kontakt finden sie unter [Fall-Begriff in ISiK](https://gemspec.gematik.de/ig/fhir/isik/basis/6.0.0-rc/Abbildung-des-Konstrukts-Fall.html).\n\n**Kompatibilität**\n\nFür das Profil ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung wird eine Kompatibilität \nmit folgenden Profilen angestrebt; \nallerdings kann nicht sichergestellt werden, dass Instanzen, \ndie gegen ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung valide sind, \nauch valide sind gegen:\n\n* Profil [Kontakt mit einer Gesundheitseinrichtung \nder Medizininformatik-Initiative](https://www.medizininformatik-initiative.de/fhir/core/modul-fall/StructureDefinition/KontaktGesundheitseinrichtung)\n\nHinweise zu Inkompatibilitäten können über die [Portalseite](https://service.gematik.de/servicedesk/customer/portal/16) gemeldet werden.'
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extension
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extension
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extension
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extension
terminplanung
hl7.fhir.r4.examples