Unable to compare with previous version: Unable to find version history at https://gematik.de/fhir/isik (Problem #1 with package-list.json at https://gematik.de/fhir/isik: Not Found)
IPA Comparison:
n/a
IPS Comparison:
n/a
Validation Flags:
On: autoLoad; Off: hintAboutNonMustSupport, anyExtensionsAllowed, checkAggregation, showReferenceMessages, noExperimentalContent, displayWarnings
This IG is version 4.0.1, while the IG 'hl7.fhir.uv.subscriptions-backport.r4' is from version 4.0.0
ImplementationGuide.dependency[5].url
warning
The canonical URL for an Implementation Guide must point directly to the implementation guide resource, not to the Implementation Guide as a whole
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource ValueSet/ISiKValueSetExample. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource CodeSystem/CodeSystemExample. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Account/AbrechnungsfallAmbulantMvzImKrankenhaus. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Account/AbrechnungsfallDRG. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Account/AbrechnungsfallGonarthrose. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Organization/AbteilungAllgemeinchirurgieOrganisationBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Condition/AltersbedingteKreislaufstoerung. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Procedure/Appendektomie. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Condition/BehandlungsDiagnoseFreitext. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Location/BettenstellplatzStandortBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Composition/CompositionExampleBlutdruck. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Bundle/BundleExampleIntensivstation. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Coverage/CoverageGesetzlich. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Coverage/CoveragePrivat. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Coverage/CoverageSonstige. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/DorisQuelle. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/DorisZiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Condition/Example-condition-ausrufezeichen-primaer. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Condition/Example-condition-ausrufezeichen-sekundaer. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Condition/Example-condition-kreuz-stern-primaer. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Condition/Example-condition-kreuz-stern-sekundaer. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/Fachabteilungskontakt. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktBettenverlegung. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktEntlassung. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktFachbereichswechsel1. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktFachbereichswechsel2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktMinimal2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktNormal. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktStationaereAufnahme. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktStationswechsel1. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/FachabteilungskontaktStationswechsel2. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Observation/ISiKAlkoholAbususBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource AllergyIntolerance/ISiKAllergieUnvertraeglichkeitBeispiel1. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource RelatedPerson/ISiKAngehoerigerMustermann. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Bundle/ISiKBundle-Example. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Device/ISiKImplantatHerzschrittmacher. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Device/ISiKImplantatHueftprothese. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Observation/ISiKRaucherStatusBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Observation/ISiKSchwangerschaftErwarteterEntbindungsterminBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Observation/ISiKSchwangerschaftsstatusBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Observation/ISiKStillstatusBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Location/isik-station-anaesthesie. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/IsikPatientTemplate. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Organization/KlinikPaediatrieOrganisationBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Organization/KlinikIntensivAnaesthesieOrganisationBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Location/KrankenhausStandortBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Condition/MittelgradigeIntelligenzminderung. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/PatientinMinimal. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/PatientinMusterfrau. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/PatientinNormal. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Practitioner/PractitionerWalterArzt. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Condition/PrimaereGonarthroseMinimal. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Condition/PrimaereGonarthroseNormal. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Location/RaumStandortBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource PractitionerRole/RolleImKrankenhausAllgemeinchirurgieBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource PractitionerRole/RolleImKrankenhausInnereMedizinBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Account/SZ1DRGFall. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource RelatedPerson/SZ1Mutter. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/SZ1Nachstationaer. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/SZ1Patient. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/SZ1Stationaer. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Coverage/SZ1VersicherungGesetzlich. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Coverage/SZ1VersicherungSelbstzahler. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/SZ1Vorstationaer. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Account/SZ2DRGFall. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/SZ2Encounter. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/SZ2Patient. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Condition/SZ2Primaerdiagnose. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Condition/SZ2Sekundaerdiagnose. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Coverage/SZ2VersicherungGesetzlich. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Location/StationICUStandortBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Location/StationPediaICUStandortBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Location/StationStandortBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Organization/KrankenhausOrganisationBeispiel. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Encounter/isik-encounter-Sternenfall. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
warning
Unable to find ImplementationGuide.definition.resource.description for the resource Patient/isik-patient-156722. Descriptions are strongly encouraged if they cannot be inferred from the resource to allow proper population of the artifact list.
output/Abbildung-des-Konstrukts-Fall.html
information
The html source does not contain the publish box; this is recommended for publishing support (see note at https://confluence.hl7.org/spaces/FHIR/pages/66930646/FHIR+Implementation+Guide+Publishing+Requirements#FHIRImplementationGuidePublishingRequirements-PublishBox). Note that this is mandatory for HL7 specifications, and on the ci-build, but in other cases it's still recommended (this is only reported once, but applies for all pages)
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation' for "CapabilityStatement-Imports-Expectation-Extension" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ExtensionISiKCapabilityStatementImportsExpectation' for "CapabilityStatement-Imports-Expectation-Extension" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBerichtBundle' for "ISiKBerichtBundle" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
No conformance term found in the text: 301 Abs. 3 SGB V. Dieser gehört zu den ‘Medizinischen Daten des Behandlungsfalls’ entsprechend der Definitionen für die Datenübermittlung
nach CONFORMANCE_STATEMENT_NOCONFWORD
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient' for "ISiKPatient" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung' for "ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung" is a canonical link and is therefore unsafe with regard to versionsHTML_LINK_VERSIONLESS_CANONICAL
The link 'artifacts.md#capabilitystatements' for "ISiK CapabilityStatements Basis" cannot be resolved (valid targets: [])HTML_LINK_CHECK_FAILED
1
warning
The HTML fragment 'ip-statements.xhtml' is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
2
warning
An HTML fragment from the set [cross-version-analysis.xhtml, cross-version-analysis-inline.xhtml] is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
3
warning
An HTML fragment from the set [dependency-table.xhtml, dependency-table-short.xhtml, dependency-table-nontech.xhtml] is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
4
warning
The HTML fragment 'globals-table.xhtml' is not included anywhere in the produced implementation guide
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'http://fhir.org/packages/de.basisprofil.r4/ImplementationGuide/de.basisprofil.r4'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'http://fhir.org/packages/dvmd.kdl.r4/ImplementationGuide/dvmd.kdl.r4'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBlutdruckSystemischArteriell'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
value should not start or finish with whitespace '\nDiese Profil ermöglicht die Dokumentation von Allergien und Unverträglichkeiten in ISiK Szenarien.\n\n**Motivation**\n\nDie Möglichkeit, auf eine Übersicht der Allergien und Unverträglichkeiten eines Patienten zuzugreifen, ist eine wichtige Funktion im klinischen Behandlungsablauf. Dies gilt insbesondere, aber nicht ausschließlich, im Bereich der Arzneimitteltherapiesicherheit.\nMotivierender Use-Case zur Einführung dieser Profile ist die [Arzneitmitteltherapiesicherheit im Krankenhaus - AMTS](https://gemspec.gematik.de/ig/fhir/isik/amts/6.0.0-rc/UseCases.html).\n\nIn FHIR werden Allergien und Unverträglichkeiten mit der [AllergyIntolerance](https://hl7.org/fhir/R4/allergyintolerance.html)-Ressource repräsentiert.\n\n**Kompatibilität**\n\nFür das Profil ISiKAllergieUnvertraeglichkeit wird eine Kompatibilität mit folgenden Profilen angestrebt; allerdings kann nicht sichergestellt werden, dass Instanzen, die gegen ISiKAllergieUnvertraeglichkeit valide sind, auch valide sind gegen:\n* [das Profil KBV_PR_Base_AllergyIntolerance der KBV](https://fhir.kbv.de/StructureDefinition/KBV_PR_Base_AllergyIntolerance)\n* [das Profil EMDAF_PR_AllergyIntolerance der GEVKO](https://fhir.gevko.de/StructureDefinition/EMDAF_PR_AllergyIntolerance)\n* [das Profil AllergyIntolerance-uv-ips der International Patient Summary](http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/StructureDefinition/AllergyIntolerance-uv-ips)\n\nHinweise zu Inkompatibilitäten können über die [Portalseite](https://service.gematik.de/servicedesk/customer/portal/16) gemeldet werden.'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_String_WS
value should not start or finish with whitespace '\nDieses Profil ermöglicht die strukturierte Abbildung von Implantaten eines Patienten in ISiK-Szenarien.\nImplantate stellen dauerhaft oder langfristig im Körper befindliche Medizinprodukte dar und sind häufig von hoher klinischer Relevanz, da sie Diagnostik, Therapieentscheidungen sowie zukünftige Behandlungsmaßnahmen unmittelbar beeinflussen können.\n\n### Motivation\n\nDie standardisierte Bereitstellung von Implantatinformationen unterstützt insbesondere:\n\n die eindeutige Identifikation implantierter Medizinprodukte,\n\n die Berücksichtigung implantatspezifischer Besonderheiten bei weiteren diagnostischen oder therapeutischen Maßnahmen,\n\n die Nachverfolgbarkeit im Rahmen von Sicherheitsmeldungen und Rückrufaktionen sowie\n\n die Dokumentation wesentlicher Implantatmerkmale (z. B. Hersteller, Modell, Seriennummer).\n\nDarüber hinaus ermöglicht das Profil eine interoperable und maschinenlesbare Darstellung implantatrelevanter Informationen und trägt zur Verbesserung der Patientensicherheit sowie zur Vermeidung von Risiken und Fehlentscheidungen im Behandlungsprozess bei.\nAls Bestandteil interoperabler Patientendaten stellt es sicher, dass relevante Implantatvorinformationen systemübergreifend verfügbar sind.\n\nDa Implantate auch im Kontext des EHDS berücksichtigt werden, erscheint eine Aufnahme in ISiK sinnvoll, um die Verfügbarkeit von Implantatinformationen in verschiedenen Anwendungsfällen zu gewährleisten, insbesondere in solchen, die über die Dokumentation in einem Entlassbrief hinausgehen.'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_String_WS
value should not start or finish with whitespace '\nDieses Profil ermöglicht die Abbildung von Besuchen/Aufenthalten eines Patienten in einer Gesundheitseinrichtung.\n\n**Motivation**\n\nInformationen über die Besuche des Patienten entlang seines \nBehandlungspfades im Krankenhaus sind ein wichtiger Bestandteil \ndes einrichtungsinternen Datenaustausches. \nSie ermöglichen die Unterscheidung von stationären und ambulanten \nsowie aufgenommenen und entlassenen Patienten. \nWeiterhin ist aus den Besuchsinformationen der aktuelle Aufenthaltsort \ndes Patienten (Fachabteilung, Station, Bettplatz) ermittelbar. \nKlinische Ressourcen werden in FHIR durch Verlinkung auf die \nEncounter-Ressource in einen Kontext zum Besuch gestellt. \nDieser Kontext ist wichtig für die Steuerung von Zugriffsberechtigungen \nund Abrechnungsprozessen. \n\nZu Beginn der meisten klinischen Workflows steht die Auswahl \ndes Besuchskontextes. \nDies geschieht bspw. durch das Suchen der Encounter-Ressource \nanhand von Eigenschaften wie Aufnahmenummer, Fallart oder Aufnahmedatum. \nDaraufhin werden die zutreffenden Suchergebnisse angezeigt \nund der gewünschte Besuch ausgewählt.\n\nIn FHIR werden Besuche, Aufenthalte, aber auch virtuelle Kontakte mit der `Encounter`-Ressource repräsentiert.\n\nWeitere Hinweise zu den Abgrenzungen der Begrifflichkeiten Fall und Kontakt finden sie unter [Fall-Begriff in ISiK](https://gemspec.gematik.de/ig/fhir/isik/basis/6.0.0-rc/Abbildung-des-Konstrukts-Fall.html).\n\n**Kompatibilität**\n\nFür das Profil ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung wird eine Kompatibilität \nmit folgenden Profilen angestrebt; \nallerdings kann nicht sichergestellt werden, dass Instanzen, \ndie gegen ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung valide sind, \nauch valide sind gegen:\n\n* Profil [Kontakt mit einer Gesundheitseinrichtung \nder Medizininformatik-Initiative](https://www.medizininformatik-initiative.de/fhir/core/modul-fall/StructureDefinition/KontaktGesundheitseinrichtung)\n\nHinweise zu Inkompatibilitäten können über die [Portalseite](https://service.gematik.de/servicedesk/customer/portal/16) gemeldet werden.'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_String_WS
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.uv.ips#1.1.0 released on 2022-11-22, but the most recent appropriate version is 2.0.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be consideredIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING_OLD
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[3] (l1/c2101)
warning
The ImplementationGuide is based on FHIR version 4.0.1 but package hl7.fhir.uv.subscriptions-backport.r4#1.1.0 is based on FHIR version 4.0.0. In general, this version mismatch should be avoided - some tools will try to make this work with variable degrees of success, but others will not even tryIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[4] (l1/c2267)
warning
The canonical URL http://fhir.org/packages/de.basisprofil.r4/ImplementationGuide/de.basisprofil.r4 doesn't point to an actual ImplementationGuide resourceIG_DEPENDENCY_INVALID_URL
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[5] (l1/c2403)
error
The URL should refer directly to the ImplementationGuide resource (e.g. include '/ImplementationGuide/')IG_DEPENDENCY_DIRECT
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[5] (l1/c2403)
warning
The canonical URL http://fhir.de/packages/de.ihe-d.terminology doesn't point to an actual ImplementationGuide resourceIG_DEPENDENCY_INVALID_URL
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[6] (l1/c2548)
warning
The canonical URL http://fhir.org/packages/dvmd.kdl.r4/ImplementationGuide/dvmd.kdl.r4 doesn't point to an actual ImplementationGuide resourceIG_DEPENDENCY_INVALID_URL
--
ImplementationGuide.dependsOn[7] (l1/c2727)
warning
The ImplementationGuide uses package ihe.formatcode.fhir#1.4.0 released on 2025-05-20, but the most recent appropriate version is 1.5.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be consideredIG_DEPENDENCY_VERSION_WARNING_OLD
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/ISiKIdentifierTypeErweiterungCS' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
Wrong Display Name 'Silberbirkenpollen' for http://snomed.info/sct#256262001. Valid display is one of 5 choices: 'Silver birch pollen' (en), 'Silver birch pollen (substance)' (en), 'European white birch pollen' (en), 'Betula pendula pollen' (en) or 'Betula pendula pollen (substance)' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#256262001 ("Silberbirkenpollen")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#256262001"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "256262001" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Wrong Display Name 'Niesen' for http://snomed.info/sct#76067001. Valid display is one of 6 choices: 'Sneezing' (en), 'Sneeze' (en), 'Sneezes' (en), 'Sneezing (finding)' (en), 'Observation of sneezing' (en) or 'Finding of sneezing' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#76067001 ("Niesen")]"
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#76067001"
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "76067001" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBerichtBundle|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBerichtBundle|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Bundle.entry[3]: discriminator = true and (resource is Composition)
,
Bundle.entry[3]: discriminator = true and (resource is Patient)
,
Bundle.entry[3]: discriminator = true and (resource is Encounter)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBerichtBundle|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBerichtBundle|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Bundle.entry[4]: discriminator = true and (resource is Composition)
,
Bundle.entry[4]: discriminator = true and (resource is Patient)
,
Bundle.entry[4]: discriminator = true and (resource is Encounter)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBerichtBundle|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBerichtBundle|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Bundle.entry[5]: discriminator = true and (resource is Composition)
,
Bundle.entry[5]: discriminator = true and (resource is Patient)
,
Bundle.entry[5]: discriminator = true and (resource is Encounter)
Details for urn:uuid:88bdd3e7-fbd1-42b8-bd9f-9afdf1e31d41 matching against profile http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Encounter|4.0.1Show Reasoning
Bundle.entry[2].resource/*Encounter/88bdd3e7-fbd1-42b8-bd9f-9afdf1e31d41*/.class: The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP: 'inpatient encounter'' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP: 'inpatient encounter'' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bp|4.0.1 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bp|4.0.1 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Bundle.entry[3].resource/*Observation/880d8c69-fc05-4e1f-8203-a8ff40007f84*/.component[2]: discriminator = true and ('8480-6' in code.coding.code) and ('http://loinc.org' in code.coding.system)
,
Bundle.entry[3].resource/*Observation/880d8c69-fc05-4e1f-8203-a8ff40007f84*/.component[2]: discriminator = true and ('8462-4' in code.coding.code) and ('http://loinc.org' in code.coding.system)
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBlutdruckSystemischArteriell'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
Profile reference 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBlutdruckSystemischArteriell' has not been checked because it could not be found, and the validator is set to not fetch unknown profilesVALIDATION_VAL_PROFILE_UNKNOWN_NOT_POLICY
Details for urn:uuid:61a2e9af-88f9-4ee2-a97f-c136530aadba matching against profile http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Procedure|4.0.1Show Reasoning
Bundle.entry[4].resource/*Procedure/61a2e9af-88f9-4ee2-a97f-c136530aadba*/.category.coding[0].display: Wrong Display Name 'Künstliche Beatmung' for http://snomed.info/sct#40617009. Valid display is one of 8 choices: 'Artificial respiration' (en), 'Mechanical ventilation' (en), 'Artificial ventilation' (en), 'Mechanically assisted breathing' (en), 'Respiratory assist, mechanical' (en), 'Mechanically assisted ventilation' (en), 'Artificial respiration (procedure)' (en) or 'Artificial ventilation (regime/therapy)' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
Constraint failed: cpb-0: 'Name should be usable as an identifier for the module by machine processing applications such as code generation (name.matches('[A-Z]([A-Za-z0-9_]){0,254}'))'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/CapabilityStatement#cpb-0
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
Constraint failed: cpb-0: 'Name should be usable as an identifier for the module by machine processing applications such as code generation (name.matches('[A-Z]([A-Za-z0-9_]){0,254}'))'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/CapabilityStatement#cpb-0
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
A definition could not be found for Canonical URL 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ImplementationGuide/ISiK-Basismodul'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_RESOLVE
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Basis/input/resources/CodeSystem-CodeSystemExample.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/CodeSystemExample) does not match the URL (http://example.org/fhir/CodeSystem/TestKatalog). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
CodeSystem (l1/c1501)
warning
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
--
CodeSystem (l1/c1501)
warning
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.description is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
--
Resource
warning
The resource CodeSystem/CodeSystemExample should have an OID assigned to cater for possible use with OID based terminology systems e.g. CDA usage (OIDs are easy to assign - see https://build.fhir.org/ig/FHIR/fhir-tools-ig/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html#ig-parameters-auto-oid-root)
--
input/resources/CodeSystem-CodeSystemExample
error
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/CodeSystemExample vs http://example.org/fhir/CodeSystem/TestKatalog
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not presentCODESYSTEM_SHAREABLE_MISSING
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/alpha-id' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2025' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2025' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
Wrong Display Name 'Herzschrittmacher' for http://snomed.info/sct#14106009. Valid display is one of 5 choices: 'Cardiac pacemaker' (en), 'Cardiac pacemaker, device (physical object)' (en), 'Cardiac pacemaker implant' (en), 'Cardiac pacemaker, device' (en) or 'Cardiac pacemaker system' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#14106009 ("Herzschrittmacher")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#14106009"
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "14106009" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Wrong Display Name 'Hüftprothese' for http://snomed.info/sct#67270000. Valid display is one of 5 choices: 'Hip prosthesis' (en), 'Hip prosthesis, device (physical object)' (en), 'Hip joint prosthesis' (en), 'Hip prosthesis, device' (en) or 'Implantable hip prosthesis' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#67270000 ("Hüftprothese")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#67270000"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "67270000" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[2]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[3]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[3]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[3]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Encounter.location[0]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'ro')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[0]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'bd')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
,
Encounter.location[0]: discriminator = true and physicalType.coding.where((system = 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/location-physical-type') and (code = 'wa')).exists() and status.where(value = 'active').exists()
Wrong Display Name 'Inpatient' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP. Valid display is 'inpatient encounter' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP: 'Inpatient'' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc'; Wrong Display Name 'Inpatient' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP. Valid display is 'inpatient encounter' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US'))Terminology_TX_NoValid_12
Wrong Display Name 'belegt' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v2-0116#O. Valid display is 'Occupied' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
Wrong Display Name 'belegt' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v2-0116#O. Valid display is 'Occupied' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
Wrong Display Name 'belegt' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v2-0116#O. Valid display is 'Occupied' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
Wrong Display Name 'belegt' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v2-0116#O. Valid display is 'Occupied' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
Wrong Display Name 'belegt' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v2-0116#O. Valid display is 'Occupied' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
Wrong Display Name 'Schädlicher Gebrauch von Alkohol' for http://snomed.info/sct#15167005. Valid display is 'Harmful pattern of use of alcohol' (en-x-sctlang-90000000-00005090-07) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.de/fhir, see log)
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://loinc.org' version '2.77' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. Valid versions: [] (from https://tx.fhir.de/fhir, see log)
Wrong Display Name 'Ja' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v2-0532#Y. Valid display is 'Yes' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Yes No Unknown NotAsked' (http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/yes-no-unknown-not-asked|1.0.0), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v2-0532#Y)Terminology_TX_NoValid_1_CC
Wrong Display Name 'Raucher' for http://snomed.info/sct#77176002. Valid display is 'Smoker' (en-x-sctlang-90000000-00005090-07) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.de/fhir, see log)
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://loinc.org' version '2.77' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. Valid versions: [] (from https://tx.fhir.de/fhir, see log)
Wrong Display Name 'Schwangerschaftsstatus' for http://loinc.org#82810-3. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Pregnancy status' (en-US), 'Pregnancy status' (en-US) or 'Pregnancy status' (en-US) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
1ms http://loinc.org/vs|2.77: Validate "[http://loinc.org|2.77#82810-3 ("Schwangerschaftsstatus")]"
1ms http://loinc.org/vs|2.77: Check "http://loinc.org|2.77#82810-3"
3ms http://loinc.org/vs|2.77: CodeSystem found: http://loinc.org|2.77 for http://loinc.org|2.77
3ms http://loinc.org/vs|2.77: check code in (http://loinc.org) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
3ms http://loinc.org/vs|2.77: Code "82810-3" found in http://loinc.org|2.77
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://loinc.org' version '2.77' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. Valid versions: [] (from https://tx.fhir.de/fhir, see log)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
Constraint failed: kvid-1: 'Der unveränderliche Teil der KVID muss 10-stellig sein und mit einem Großbuchstaben anfangen (matches('^[A-Z][0-9]{9}$'))' (defined in http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/identifier-kvid-10)http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/identifier-kvid-10#kvid-1
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-namenszusatz' in url)
,
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' in url)
,
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-namenszusatz' in url)
,
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' in url)
,
Patient.name[0].family.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.gender.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/gender-amtlich-de' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.birthDate.extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' in url)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.address[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractContext'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' in url)
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue could not be found so is not allowed hereExtension_EXT_Unknown_NotHere
No definition could be found for URL value 'http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/sdc/StructureDefinition/sdc-questionnaire-templateExtractValue'Type_Specific_Checks_DT_URL_Resolve
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.address[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' in url)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' in url)
,
Patient.address[0].line[0].extension[0]: discriminator = true and ('http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' in url)
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://snomed.info/sct' version 'http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20200131' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. Valid versions: http://snomed.info/sct/11000146104/version/20240930, http://snomed.info/sct/11000172109/version/20231115, http://snomed.info/sct/2011000195101/version/20230607, http://snomed.info/sct/32506021000036107/version/20230731, http://snomed.info/sct/45991000052106/version/20231130, http://snomed.info/sct/554471000005108/version/20250930, http://snomed.info/sct/731000124108/version/20230301, http://snomed.info/sct/731000124108/version/20240301, http://snomed.info/sct/731000124108/version/20250901, http://snomed.info/sct/827022005/version/20241216, http://snomed.info/sct/83821000000107/version/20230412, http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20240201, http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 and http://snomed.info/xsct/900000000000207008/version/20250814 (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://fhir.kbv.de/CodeSystem/KBV_CS_Base_Role_Care' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
PractitionerRole.code[0].coding[0]: discriminator = true and ($this memberOf 'https://fhir.kbv.de/ValueSet/KBV_VS_Base_Role_Care')
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)Show Reasoning
This element does not match any known slice Defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
PractitionerRole.code[0].coding[0]: discriminator = true and ($this memberOf 'https://fhir.kbv.de/ValueSet/KBV_VS_Base_Role_Care')
Wrong Display Name 'Chirurgische Prozedur' for http://snomed.info/sct#387713003. Valid display is one of 6 choices: 'Surgical procedure (procedure)' (en), 'Surgical procedure' (en), 'Operation' (en), 'Surgical procedures' (en), 'Operative procedure' (en) or 'Surgery' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#387713003 ("Chirurgische Prozedur")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#387713003"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "387713003" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Wrong Display Name 'Chirurgische Prozedur' for http://snomed.info/sct#387713003. Valid display is 'Surgical procedure (procedure)' (en), 'Surgical procedure' (en), 'Operation' (en), 'Surgical procedures' (en), 'Operative procedure' (en), 'Surgery' (en) or 'Surgical procedure' (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenKategorieSCT|6.0.0-rc: Analysing https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenKategorieSCT|6.0.0-rc for validation purposes
0ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenKategorieSCT|6.0.0-rc: Parameters: disp-lang=en-US, generate-narrative, default-to-latest
0ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenKategorieSCT|6.0.0-rc: Prepare include[0]: "(http://snomed.info/sct)(165197003,363679005,387713003,18629005,277132007,394841004)"
0ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenKategorieSCT|6.0.0-rc: CodeSystem found: "http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201"
0ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenKategorieSCT|6.0.0-rc: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#387713003 ("Chirurgische Prozedur")]"
0ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenKategorieSCT|6.0.0-rc: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#387713003"
1ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenKategorieSCT|6.0.0-rc: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct
1ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenKategorieSCT|6.0.0-rc: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct)(165197003,363679005,387713003,18629005,277132007,394841004) at Coding
1ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenKategorieSCT|6.0.0-rc: Code "387713003" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Wrong Display Name 'Appendektomie' for http://snomed.info/sct#80146002. Valid display is one of 9 choices: 'Appendectomy' (en), 'Appendectomy, NOS' (en), 'Excision of appendix, NOS' (en), 'Primary appendectomy' (en), 'Appendicectomy, NOS' (en), 'Excision of appendix' (en), 'Appendicectomy' (en), 'Appendectomy (procedure)' (en) or 'Excision of appendix (procedure)' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) Display_Name_for__should_be_one_of__instead_of
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#80146002 ("Appendektomie"), http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/ops|2024#5-470 ("Appendektomie")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#80146002"
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "80146002" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/ops|2024#5-470"
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/ops' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4, see log, or see the servers logic) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM_VERSION_NONE
0ms tx-op
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#80146002 ("Appendektomie"), http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/ops|2024#5-470 ("Appendektomie")]"
0ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#80146002"
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct) at CodeableConcept.coding[0]
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Code "80146002" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
1ms http://snomed.info/sct/vs|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201: Check "http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/ops|2024#5-470"
The code provided (http://snomed.info/sct#80146002) was not found in the value set 'ProzedurenCodesSCT' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenCodesSCT|6.0.0-rc), and a code from this value set is required: Wrong Display Name 'Appendektomie' for http://snomed.info/sct#80146002. Valid display is one of 9 choices: 'Appendectomy' (en), 'Appendectomy, NOS' (en), 'Excision of appendix, NOS' (en), 'Primary appendectomy' (en), 'Appendicectomy, NOS' (en), 'Excision of appendix' (en), 'Appendicectomy' (en), 'Appendectomy (procedure)' (en) or 'Excision of appendix (procedure)' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US') (from server, see log, or see the servers logic) Terminology_TX_Confirm_4a
0ms tx-op
0ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenCodesSCT|6.0.0-rc: Analysing https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenCodesSCT|6.0.0-rc for validation purposes
0ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenCodesSCT|6.0.0-rc: Parameters: disp-lang=en-US, generate-narrative, default-to-latest
0ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenCodesSCT|6.0.0-rc: Prepare include[0]: "(http://snomed.info/sct)(conceptdescendent-of71388002)"
0ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenCodesSCT|6.0.0-rc: CodeSystem found: "http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201"
0ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenCodesSCT|6.0.0-rc: Validate "[http://snomed.info/sct#80146002 ("Appendektomie")]"
1ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenCodesSCT|6.0.0-rc: Check "http://snomed.info/sct#80146002"
1ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenCodesSCT|6.0.0-rc: CodeSystem found: http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 for http://snomed.info/sct
1ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenCodesSCT|6.0.0-rc: check code in (http://snomed.info/sct)(conceptdescendent-of71388002) at Coding
1ms https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenCodesSCT|6.0.0-rc: Filter concept descendent-of 71388002: Code "80146002" found in http://snomed.info/sct|http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201
Constraint failed: spd-0: 'Name should be usable as an identifier for the module by machine processing applications such as code generation (name.matches('[A-Z]([A-Za-z0-9_]){0,254}'))'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/SearchParameter#spd-0
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '2.0.0', found versions: 0.3.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 1.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0), 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation|2.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '2.0.0', found versions: 0.3.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 1.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0), 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation|2.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/ISiKIdentifierTypeErweiterungCS' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/ISiKIdentifierTypeErweiterungCS' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated (from https://tx.fhir.org/r4) UNKNOWN_CODESYSTEM
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/regex|5.2.0 is deprecated with the note: 'This was deprecated in favor of using a constraint on the element using FHIRPath, since constraints allow for the provision of a human readable message associated with the regex'MSG_DEPENDS_ON_DEPRECATED_NOTE
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The markdown contains content that appears to be an embedded HTML tag starting at '<i'. This will (or SHOULD) be escaped by the presentation layer. The content should be checked to confirm that this is the desired behaviourTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_MARKDOWN_HTML
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActCode|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The markdown contains content that appears to be an embedded HTML tag starting at '<d'. This will (or SHOULD) be escaped by the presentation layer. The content should be checked to confirm that this is the desired behaviourTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_MARKDOWN_HTML
The markdown contains content that appears to be an embedded HTML tag starting at '<i'. This will (or SHOULD) be escaped by the presentation layer. The content should be checked to confirm that this is the desired behaviourTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_MARKDOWN_HTML
The markdown contains content that appears to be an embedded HTML tag starting at '<d'. This will (or SHOULD) be escaped by the presentation layer. The content should be checked to confirm that this is the desired behaviourTYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_MARKDOWN_HTML
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/condition-related'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/condition-related' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/condition-related|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/condition-related'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/condition-related' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/condition-related|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
Review the extension type for ISiKExtensionAbrechnungsDiagnoseProzedurAmbulant: extensions should not have a context of Element unless it's really intended that they can be used anywhereSD_CONTEXT_SHOULD_NOT_BE_ELEMENT
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
ISiK-enc-8: The left side is inherently a collection, and so the expression 'coding.code != 'billing'' may fail or return false if there is more than one item in the content being evaluatedFHIRPATH_COLLECTION_STATUS_OPERATION_LEFT
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The repeating element has a pattern. The pattern will apply to all the repeats (this has not been clear to all users)SD_VALUE_TYPE_REPEAT_HINT
--
StructureDefinition.snapshot (l1/c461932)
warning
The slice 'Versichertennummer_PKV' on path 'Patient.identifier' is not marked as 'must-support' which is not consistent with the element that defines the slicing, where 'must-support' is true
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The repeating element has a pattern. The pattern will apply to all the repeats (this has not been clear to all users)SD_VALUE_TYPE_REPEAT_HINT
--
StructureDefinition.snapshot (l1/c373631)
warning
The slice 'Geburtsname' on path 'Practitioner.name' is not marked as 'must-support' which is not consistent with the element that defines the slicing, where 'must-support' is true
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite|5.2.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116|3.0.0'TYPE_SPECIFIC_CHECKS_DT_CANONICAL_MULTIPLE_POSSIBLE_VERSIONS
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)SD_PATH_SLICING_DEPRECATED
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Basis/input/resources/StructureDefinition-PlannedEndDate.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedEndDate) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedEndDate). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
StructureDefinition (l1/c16986)
error
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extensionVALIDATION_HL7_WG_NEEDED
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedEndDate vs http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedEndDate
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Basis/input/resources/StructureDefinition-PlannedStartDate.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedStartDate) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedStartDate). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
StructureDefinition (l1/c17068)
error
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extensionVALIDATION_HL7_WG_NEEDED
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedStartDate vs http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedStartDate
Pinned the version of http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode to 10.0.0 from choices of 10.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0), 7.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 9.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0)PIN_VERSION
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Basis/input/resources/ValueSet-ISiKValueSetExample.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKValueSetExample) does not match the URL (http://example.org/fhir/ValueSet/TestValueSet). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to matchRESOURCE_CANONICAL_MISMATCH
--
ValueSet (l1/c1798)
warning
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.title is mandatory, but it is not present
--
ValueSet (l1/c1798)
warning
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.experimental is mandatory, but it is not present
--
ValueSet (l1/c1798)
warning
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.description is mandatory, but it is not present
--
Resource
warning
The resource ValueSet/ISiKValueSetExample should have an OID assigned to cater for possible use with OID based terminology systems e.g. CDA usage (OIDs are easy to assign - see https://build.fhir.org/ig/FHIR/fhir-tools-ig/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html#ig-parameters-auto-oid-root)
--
input/resources/ValueSet-ISiKValueSetExample
error
URL Mismatch https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKValueSetExample vs http://example.org/fhir/ValueSet/TestValueSet
Wrong Display Name 'Administration of medicine' for http://snomed.info/sct#18629005. Valid display is one of 9 choices: 'Administration of medication' (en), 'Administration of medication, NOS' (en), 'Giving medication' (en), 'Administration of medication (procedure)' (en), 'Medication administration' (en), 'Medication administration treatments and procedures' (en), 'Medication treatment' (en), 'Administration of drug or medicament (procedure)' (en) or 'Administration of drug or medicament' (en) (for the language(s) 'en, en-US'). Note that the display in the ValueSet does not have to match; this check exists to help check that it's not accidentally the wrong codeVALUESET_CODE_CONCEPT_HINT
--
ValueSet (l1/c2072)
warning
Published value sets SHOULD conform to the ShareableValueSet profile, which says that the element ValueSet.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Wrong Display Name 'Entbindungstermin, geschätzt aus der letzten Menstruationsperiode' for http://loinc.org#11779-6. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Delivery date Estimated from last menstrual period' (en-US), 'Delivery date Estimated from last menstrual period' (en-US) or 'Deliv date Est from LMP' (en-US) (for the language(s) 'en, en-US'). Note that the display in the ValueSet does not have to match; this check exists to help check that it's not accidentally the wrong codeVALUESET_CODE_CONCEPT_HINT
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ordinalValue|5.2.0 is deprecated with the note: 'Replaced by [[[http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/itemWeight]]]'MSG_DEPENDS_ON_DEPRECATED_NOTE
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.description is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
Published code systems SHOULD conform to the ShareableCodeSystem profile, which says that the element CodeSystem.title is mandatory, but it is not present
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBerichtBundle|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBerichtBundle|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBerichtBundle|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bp|4.0.1 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/humanname-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile http://fhir.de/StructureDefinition/address-de-basis|1.5.4 (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKPatient|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
This element does not match any known slice defined in the profile https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKRolleImKrankenhaus|6.0.0-rc (this may not be a problem, but you should check that it's not intended to match a slice)
Wrong Display Name 'Niesen' for http://snomed.info/sct#76067001. Valid display is one of 6 choices: 'Sneezing' (en), 'Sneeze' (en), 'Sneezes' (en), 'Sneezing (finding)' (en), 'Observation of sneezing' (en) or 'Finding of sneezing' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Hüftprothese' for http://snomed.info/sct#67270000. Valid display is one of 5 choices: 'Hip prosthesis' (en), 'Hip prosthesis, device (physical object)' (en), 'Hip joint prosthesis' (en), 'Hip prosthesis, device' (en) or 'Implantable hip prosthesis' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Inpatient' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP. Valid display is 'inpatient encounter' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Schwangerschaftsstatus' for http://loinc.org#82810-3. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Pregnancy status' (en-US), 'Pregnancy status' (en-US) or 'Pregnancy status' (en-US) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
Wrong Display Name 'Appendektomie' for http://snomed.info/sct#80146002. Valid display is one of 9 choices: 'Appendectomy' (en), 'Appendectomy, NOS' (en), 'Excision of appendix, NOS' (en), 'Primary appendectomy' (en), 'Appendicectomy, NOS' (en), 'Excision of appendix' (en), 'Appendicectomy' (en), 'Appendectomy (procedure)' (en) or 'Excision of appendix (procedure)' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
ISiK-enc-8: The left side is inherently a collection, and so the expression 'coding.code != 'billing'' may fail or return false if there is more than one item in the content being evaluated
The canonical URL http://fhir.org/packages/de.basisprofil.r4/ImplementationGuide/de.basisprofil.r4 doesn't point to an actual ImplementationGuide resource
The ImplementationGuide is based on FHIR version 4.0.1 but package hl7.fhir.uv.subscriptions-backport.r4#1.1.0 is based on FHIR version 4.0.0. In general, this version mismatch should be avoided - some tools will try to make this work with variable degrees of success, but others will not even try
The ImplementationGuide uses package hl7.fhir.uv.ips#1.1.0 released on 2022-11-22, but the most recent appropriate version is 2.0.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be considered
The ImplementationGuide uses package ihe.formatcode.fhir#1.4.0 released on 2025-05-20, but the most recent appropriate version is 1.5.0. This reference is getting old and the more recent version should be considered
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/regex|5.2.0 is deprecated with the note: 'This was deprecated in favor of using a constraint on the element using FHIRPath, since constraints allow for the provision of a human readable message associated with the regex'
The extension http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ordinalValue|5.2.0 is deprecated with the note: 'Replaced by [[[http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/itemWeight]]]'
Pinned the version of http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode to 10.0.0 from choices of 10.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0), 7.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 9.0.0 (hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0)
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Basis/input/resources/CodeSystem-CodeSystemExample.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/CodeSystemExample) does not match the URL (http://example.org/fhir/CodeSystem/TestKatalog). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Basis/input/resources/StructureDefinition-PlannedEndDate.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedEndDate) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedEndDate). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Basis/input/resources/StructureDefinition-PlannedStartDate.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/PlannedStartDate) does not match the URL (http://hl7.org/fhir/5.0/StructureDefinition/extension-Encounter.plannedStartDate). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Conformance resource /__w/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/spec-ISiK-Basismodul/publisher-guides/Basis/input/resources/ValueSet-ISiKValueSetExample.json - the canonical URL (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKValueSetExample) does not match the URL (http://example.org/fhir/ValueSet/TestValueSet). Use the special-url parameter if you really mean for it not to match
Review the extension type for ISiKExtensionAbrechnungsDiagnoseProzedurAmbulant: extensions should not have a context of Element unless it's really intended that they can be used anywhere
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
The discriminator type 'pattern' is deprecated in R5+. For future compatibility, you could consider using type=value with a pattern[x] instead (if this is not an inherited slicing)
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '2.0.0', found versions: 0.3.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 1.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0), 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation|2.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '2.0.0', found versions: 0.3.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 1.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#6.3.0), 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/conformance-expectation|2.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActCode|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/condition-related'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/condition-related' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/condition-related|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/condition-related'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/condition-related' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/condition-related|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActEncounterCode|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ActPriority|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0092|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/ValueSet/name-part-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/data-absent-reason|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-name|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/humanname-own-prefix|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-EN-qualifier|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-precinct|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-streetName|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-houseNumber|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-additionalLocator|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/iso21090-ADXP-postBox|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '5.2.0', found versions: 4.0.1 (from hl7.fhir.r4.core#4.0.1), 5.2.0 (from hl7.fhir.uv.extensions.r4#5.2.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite' to 'http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/bodySite|5.2.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v3-ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType|3.0.0'
There are multiple different potential matches for the url 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116'. It might be a good idea to fix to the correct version to reduce the likelihood of a wrong version being selected by an implementation/implementer, or use the [IG Parameter `pin-canonicals`](https://hl7.org/fhir/tools/CodeSystem-ig-parameters.html). Using version '3.0.0', found versions: 2.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#5.0.0), 3.0.0 (from hl7.terminology.r4#7.1.0). Suggested fix: change the canonical reference from 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116' to 'http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/v2-0116|3.0.0'
The markdown contains content that appears to be an embedded HTML tag starting at '<i'. This will (or SHOULD) be escaped by the presentation layer. The content should be checked to confirm that this is the desired behaviour
The markdown contains content that appears to be an embedded HTML tag starting at '<d'. This will (or SHOULD) be escaped by the presentation layer. The content should be checked to confirm that this is the desired behaviour
The markdown contains content that appears to be an embedded HTML tag starting at '<i'. This will (or SHOULD) be escaped by the presentation layer. The content should be checked to confirm that this is the desired behaviour
The markdown contains content that appears to be an embedded HTML tag starting at '<d'. This will (or SHOULD) be escaped by the presentation layer. The content should be checked to confirm that this is the desired behaviour
The code provided (http://snomed.info/sct#80146002) was not found in the value set 'ProzedurenCodesSCT' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ProzedurenCodesSCT|6.0.0-rc), and a code from this value set is required: Wrong Display Name 'Appendektomie' for http://snomed.info/sct#80146002. Valid display is one of 9 choices: 'Appendectomy' (en), 'Appendectomy, NOS' (en), 'Excision of appendix, NOS' (en), 'Primary appendectomy' (en), 'Appendicectomy, NOS' (en), 'Excision of appendix' (en), 'Appendicectomy' (en), 'Appendectomy (procedure)' (en) or 'Excision of appendix (procedure)' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP: 'inpatient encounter'' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#AMB' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc')
The Coding provided (http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP) was not found in the value set 'ISiKEncounterClassDE' (https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc), and a code is required from this value set. (error message = The provided code 'http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP: 'Inpatient'' was not found in the value set 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/ValueSet/ISiKEncounterClassDE|6.0.0-rc'; Wrong Display Name 'Inpatient' for http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v3-ActCode#IMP. Valid display is 'inpatient encounter' (en) (for the language(s) 'en-US'))
None of the codings provided are in the value set 'Yes No Unknown NotAsked' (http://terminology.hl7.org/ValueSet/yes-no-unknown-not-asked|1.0.0), and a coding from this value set is required) (codes = http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/v2-0532#Y)
value should not start or finish with whitespace '\nDiese Profil ermöglicht die Dokumentation von Allergien und Unverträglichkeiten in ISiK Szenarien.\n\n**Motivation**\n\nDie Möglichkeit, auf eine Übersicht der Allergien und Unverträglichkeiten eines Patienten zuzugreifen, ist eine wichtige Funktion im klinischen Behandlungsablauf. Dies gilt insbesondere, aber nicht ausschließlich, im Bereich der Arzneimitteltherapiesicherheit.\nMotivierender Use-Case zur Einführung dieser Profile ist die [Arzneitmitteltherapiesicherheit im Krankenhaus - AMTS](https://gemspec.gematik.de/ig/fhir/isik/amts/6.0.0-rc/UseCases.html).\n\nIn FHIR werden Allergien und Unverträglichkeiten mit der [AllergyIntolerance](https://hl7.org/fhir/R4/allergyintolerance.html)-Ressource repräsentiert.\n\n**Kompatibilität**\n\nFür das Profil ISiKAllergieUnvertraeglichkeit wird eine Kompatibilität mit folgenden Profilen angestrebt; allerdings kann nicht sichergestellt werden, dass Instanzen, die gegen ISiKAllergieUnvertraeglichkeit valide sind, auch valide sind gegen:\n* [das Profil KBV_PR_Base_AllergyIntolerance der KBV](https://fhir.kbv.de/StructureDefinition/KBV_PR_Base_AllergyIntolerance)\n* [das Profil EMDAF_PR_AllergyIntolerance der GEVKO](https://fhir.gevko.de/StructureDefinition/EMDAF_PR_AllergyIntolerance)\n* [das Profil AllergyIntolerance-uv-ips der International Patient Summary](http://hl7.org/fhir/uv/ips/StructureDefinition/AllergyIntolerance-uv-ips)\n\nHinweise zu Inkompatibilitäten können über die [Portalseite](https://service.gematik.de/servicedesk/customer/portal/16) gemeldet werden.'
value should not start or finish with whitespace '\nDieses Profil ermöglicht die strukturierte Abbildung von Implantaten eines Patienten in ISiK-Szenarien.\nImplantate stellen dauerhaft oder langfristig im Körper befindliche Medizinprodukte dar und sind häufig von hoher klinischer Relevanz, da sie Diagnostik, Therapieentscheidungen sowie zukünftige Behandlungsmaßnahmen unmittelbar beeinflussen können.\n\n### Motivation\n\nDie standardisierte Bereitstellung von Implantatinformationen unterstützt insbesondere:\n\n die eindeutige Identifikation implantierter Medizinprodukte,\n\n die Berücksichtigung implantatspezifischer Besonderheiten bei weiteren diagnostischen oder therapeutischen Maßnahmen,\n\n die Nachverfolgbarkeit im Rahmen von Sicherheitsmeldungen und Rückrufaktionen sowie\n\n die Dokumentation wesentlicher Implantatmerkmale (z. B. Hersteller, Modell, Seriennummer).\n\nDarüber hinaus ermöglicht das Profil eine interoperable und maschinenlesbare Darstellung implantatrelevanter Informationen und trägt zur Verbesserung der Patientensicherheit sowie zur Vermeidung von Risiken und Fehlentscheidungen im Behandlungsprozess bei.\nAls Bestandteil interoperabler Patientendaten stellt es sicher, dass relevante Implantatvorinformationen systemübergreifend verfügbar sind.\n\nDa Implantate auch im Kontext des EHDS berücksichtigt werden, erscheint eine Aufnahme in ISiK sinnvoll, um die Verfügbarkeit von Implantatinformationen in verschiedenen Anwendungsfällen zu gewährleisten, insbesondere in solchen, die über die Dokumentation in einem Entlassbrief hinausgehen.'
value should not start or finish with whitespace '\nDieses Profil ermöglicht die Abbildung von Besuchen/Aufenthalten eines Patienten in einer Gesundheitseinrichtung.\n\n**Motivation**\n\nInformationen über die Besuche des Patienten entlang seines \nBehandlungspfades im Krankenhaus sind ein wichtiger Bestandteil \ndes einrichtungsinternen Datenaustausches. \nSie ermöglichen die Unterscheidung von stationären und ambulanten \nsowie aufgenommenen und entlassenen Patienten. \nWeiterhin ist aus den Besuchsinformationen der aktuelle Aufenthaltsort \ndes Patienten (Fachabteilung, Station, Bettplatz) ermittelbar. \nKlinische Ressourcen werden in FHIR durch Verlinkung auf die \nEncounter-Ressource in einen Kontext zum Besuch gestellt. \nDieser Kontext ist wichtig für die Steuerung von Zugriffsberechtigungen \nund Abrechnungsprozessen. \n\nZu Beginn der meisten klinischen Workflows steht die Auswahl \ndes Besuchskontextes. \nDies geschieht bspw. durch das Suchen der Encounter-Ressource \nanhand von Eigenschaften wie Aufnahmenummer, Fallart oder Aufnahmedatum. \nDaraufhin werden die zutreffenden Suchergebnisse angezeigt \nund der gewünschte Besuch ausgewählt.\n\nIn FHIR werden Besuche, Aufenthalte, aber auch virtuelle Kontakte mit der `Encounter`-Ressource repräsentiert.\n\nWeitere Hinweise zu den Abgrenzungen der Begrifflichkeiten Fall und Kontakt finden sie unter [Fall-Begriff in ISiK](https://gemspec.gematik.de/ig/fhir/isik/basis/6.0.0-rc/Abbildung-des-Konstrukts-Fall.html).\n\n**Kompatibilität**\n\nFür das Profil ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung wird eine Kompatibilität \nmit folgenden Profilen angestrebt; \nallerdings kann nicht sichergestellt werden, dass Instanzen, \ndie gegen ISiKKontaktGesundheitseinrichtung valide sind, \nauch valide sind gegen:\n\n* Profil [Kontakt mit einer Gesundheitseinrichtung \nder Medizininformatik-Initiative](https://www.medizininformatik-initiative.de/fhir/core/modul-fall/StructureDefinition/KontaktGesundheitseinrichtung)\n\nHinweise zu Inkompatibilitäten können über die [Portalseite](https://service.gematik.de/servicedesk/customer/portal/16) gemeldet werden.'
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/ISiKIdentifierTypeErweiterungCS' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/ISiKIdentifierTypeErweiterungCS' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated
A definition for CodeSystem 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/CodeSystem/ISiKIdentifierTypeErweiterungCS' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://snomed.info/sct' version 'http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20200131' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. Valid versions: http://snomed.info/sct/11000146104/version/20240930, http://snomed.info/sct/11000172109/version/20231115, http://snomed.info/sct/2011000195101/version/20230607, http://snomed.info/sct/32506021000036107/version/20230731, http://snomed.info/sct/45991000052106/version/20231130, http://snomed.info/sct/554471000005108/version/20250930, http://snomed.info/sct/731000124108/version/20230301, http://snomed.info/sct/731000124108/version/20240301, http://snomed.info/sct/731000124108/version/20250901, http://snomed.info/sct/827022005/version/20241216, http://snomed.info/sct/83821000000107/version/20230412, http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20240201, http://snomed.info/sct/900000000000207008/version/20250201 and http://snomed.info/xsct/900000000000207008/version/20250814
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/alpha-id' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2025' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2025' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/icd-10-gm' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
A definition for CodeSystem 'http://fhir.de/CodeSystem/bfarm/ops' version '2024' could not be found, so the code cannot be validated. No versions of this code system are known
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extension
When HL7 is publishing a resource, the owning committee must be stated using the http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/structuredefinition-wg extension
Profile reference 'https://gematik.de/fhir/isik/StructureDefinition/ISiKBlutdruckSystemischArteriell' has not been checked because it could not be found, and the validator is set to not fetch unknown profiles
Wrong Display Name 'Administration of medicine' for http://snomed.info/sct#18629005. Valid display is one of 9 choices: 'Administration of medication' (en), 'Administration of medication, NOS' (en), 'Giving medication' (en), 'Administration of medication (procedure)' (en), 'Medication administration' (en), 'Medication administration treatments and procedures' (en), 'Medication treatment' (en), 'Administration of drug or medicament (procedure)' (en) or 'Administration of drug or medicament' (en) (for the language(s) 'en, en-US'). Note that the display in the ValueSet does not have to match; this check exists to help check that it's not accidentally the wrong code
Wrong Display Name 'Entbindungstermin, geschätzt aus der letzten Menstruationsperiode' for http://loinc.org#11779-6. Valid display is one of 3 choices: 'Delivery date Estimated from last menstrual period' (en-US), 'Delivery date Estimated from last menstrual period' (en-US) or 'Deliv date Est from LMP' (en-US) (for the language(s) 'en, en-US'). Note that the display in the ValueSet does not have to match; this check exists to help check that it's not accidentally the wrong code
basis
hl7.fhir.uv.tools.r4